Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, Meters. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Progression and you may Person Conclusion, 29(2), 119–126.
Cross-sectional study from intimacy, hobbies, and relationship: Evaluation the latest presumptions of triangular principle from like
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The area from connection in the human mating. Article on Standard Therapy, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A good. (2002). Internet sites paradox reviewed. Journal off Social Facts, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Web sites paradox: A social technical you to definitely reduces public wedding and you may mental really-becoming? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, R.M., & Industries, J. M. (2001). Amount, timing, and you will time of marriage ceremonies and you may divorces. Newest People Account, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2005).
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Age. (2004). Perception greatest regarding undertaking worse: Public comparisons inside close matchmaking. Diary regarding Character and you can Public Mindset, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A beneficial., & Gailliot, Yards. T. (2009). Journal out of Identity and you can Personal Mindset, 97(1), 74–87.
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. An effective., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automatic inattention to help you glamorous solutions: The latest changed mindset out-of matchmaking maintenance. Advancement and you can Person Decisions, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. Age. (1981). Sequential studies of argument and accord in the disappointed and you can nondistressed relationship people. Record out of Consulting and you may Systematic Mindset, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. A beneficial., Eco-friendly, Good. S., Gleason, Meters. J. (2002). Relationships creation on the internet: What is the big attraction? Journal from Social Affairs, 58(1), 9–29.
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The advantages of confident illusions: Idealization plus the design away from pleasure into the close matchmaking. Log from Character and you may Social Mindset, 70(1), 79–98.
Neff, L. A great., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-analysis purposes during the romantic matchmaking: A type of worldwide enhancement and you will certain confirmation. When you look at the P. Noller & J. A great. Feeney (Eds.), Facts ents on the examination of pair telecommunications (pp. 32–58). Nyc, NY: Cambridge College or university Drive.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the client-counselor bond from the lens out-of attachment theory. Psychotherapy: Idea, Lookup, Routine, Education, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The societal keeping track of system: Enhanced susceptibility to public signs while the a transformative response to social exemption. When you look at the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The brand new social outcast: Ostracism, public different, getting rejected, and bullying (pp. 213–226). Ny, NY: Psychology Press.
Pierce, T., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). Worldwide and you can certain relational designs about experience of personal affairs. Record from Character and you will Social Therapy, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. An excellent., Tran, S., ). Attachment and you will pointers seeking to into the close matchmaking. Character and you can Social Therapy Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and you will certain connection representations inside adulthood: Is there a relationship?. Diary Off Social And private Matchmaking, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. Elizabeth., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. A. (2001)mitment and matchmaking repair systems. Inside the J. Harvey & An effective. Wenzel (Eds.), Personal intimate relationship: Fix and you will enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, An effective. D. (2000). Projection in person feeling among spouses as the a purpose of the fresh new similarity in their common experiences. Identity And you can Societal Therapy Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Aftereffects of salience off extrinsic benefits toward taste and loving. Record off Identification and you may Societal Mindset, 38(3), 453–460.
